Software Engineering Volume Review Form

Please use this form to provide your feedback on the Second public draft of the CCSE

Before you add your comments, please look at the comments from the previous round of reviews, and the steering committee's responses to those.

If you want to save your work temporarily and then continue, you may submit this form at any time.

The deadline for this round of reviews is March 22, 2004. The information you provide will be used to produce the final version of the document, to be available in April or May 2004. Please focus your review on the new material presented since Chapter 4 has already undergone several review cycles.

Your comments will be publicly accessible, as will your name and affiliation. Your address and email will be kept confidential.

Section A: Reviewer Profile

A1.

Name:

A2.

Current Institution/Organisation:

A3.

Address:
(so we may contact you if we have additional questions)
This will not be publicly released.

A4.

Email Address:
This will not be publicly released.

A5.

Areas of research or industrial practice expertise in Software Engineering (please list one per line):

A6.

Areas of teaching experience in Software Engineering (please list one per line):

A7.

Context for teaching Software Engineering (please check the relevant boxes, if any):
Undergraduate students (Bachelors)
Graduate students (Masters / Ph.D.)
Practitionners

Section B: General Comments

B1.

Does this draft outline provide an adequate baseline for the development of guidelines for an undergraduate curriculum for the Software Engineering discipline?
Yes
Basically acceptable
No

Please comment on the structure of the draft curriculum, and in particular, please identify any features that you particularly agree or disagree with. If you feel that there are significant omissions, or problems that limit the international acceptability of the document, then please identify these too. Note that later on you will be able to provide detailed comments on an item by item basis, so your comments here can be general in nature.

B2.

Positive features:

B3.

Negative features:

B4.

Omissions:

B5.

Adaptations needed to ensure that the document is applicable in all countries:

Section C: Proposed changes to specific items

In this review section we ask you to comment on specific chapters/sections of the document. While all comments are welcome, we ask that you focus on all chapters other than 4 since this chapter has already had extensive review.

We provide space for you to comment on up to 15 items, but you can use as few or as many as you like. If you have more than 15 comments, you will be able to continue with another copy of the form.
Section reference 1st Change proposed Rationale for change and consequences for other units Weighting of comment
Rationale:

Consequences:
Essential change

Desirable change

Should be considered

Section reference 2nd Change proposed Rationale for change and consequences for other units Weighting of comment
Rationale:

Consequences:
Essential change

Desirable change

Should be considered

Section reference 3rd Change proposed Rationale for change and consequences for other units Weighting of comment
Rationale:

Consequences:
Essential change

Desirable change

Should be considered
If you have no more comments, then you may , otherwise, please continue below.

Section reference 4th Change proposed Rationale for change and consequences for other units Weighting of comment
Rationale:

Consequences:
Essential change

Desirable change

Should be considered

Section reference 5th Change proposed Rationale for change and consequences for other units Weighting of comment
Rationale:

Consequences:
Essential change

Desirable change

Should be considered

Section reference 6th Change proposed Rationale for change and consequences for other units Weighting of comment
Rationale:

Consequences:
Essential change

Desirable change

Should be considered
If you have no more comments, then you may , otherwise, please continue below.

Section reference 7th Change proposed Rationale for change and consequences for other units Weighting of comment
Rationale:

Consequences:
Essential change

Desirable change

Should be considered

Section reference 8th Change proposed Rationale for change and consequences for other units Weighting of comment
Rationale:

Consequences:
Essential change

Desirable change

Should be considered

Section reference 9th Change proposed Rationale for change and consequences for other units Weighting of comment
Rationale:

Consequences:
Essential change

Desirable change

Should be considered
If you have no more comments, then you may , otherwise, please continue below.

Section reference 10th Change proposed Rationale for change and consequences for other units Weighting of comment
Rationale:

Consequences:
Essential cha\nge

Desirable change

Should be considered

Section reference 11th Change proposed Rationale for change and consequences for other units Weighting of comment
Rationale:

Consequences:
Essential change

Desirable change

Should be considered

Section reference 12th Change proposed Rationale for change and consequences for other units Weighting of comment
Rationale:

Consequences:
Essential change

Desirable change

Should be considered
If you have no more comments, then you may , otherwise, please continue below.

Section reference 13th Change proposed Rationale for change and consequences for other units Weighting of comment
Rationale:

Consequences:
Essential change

Desirable change

Should be considered

Section reference 14th Change proposed Rationale for change and consequences for other units Weighting of comment
Rationale:

Consequences:
Essential change

Desirable change

Should be considered

Section reference 15th Change proposed Rationale for change and consequences for other units Weighting of comment
Rationale:

Consequences:
Essential change

Desirable change

Should be considered
Please now . You will be given the opportunity to submit additional changes, if you did not have space above.

Thank you for your submission. Your input will be reviewed by the steering committee, and used with input from others to revise the document. A new version of the document will be published in April/May 2004.

If repeated attempts to submit the above fail (e.g. there are problems on the Internet), and you don't want to waste your work, you can print the this page (preferably to a ps or pdf file) and then email the webmaster for instructions about what to do with your printed version..